Equipment

The supersuits were wrong, philosophically speaking

By 1 Comment1 Min Read

Cogito Ergo SumSo, I’m totally out of my depth here, but this article is interesting, discussing whether the supersuits were wrong or not, philosophically speaking. The conclusion is that yes, if we value fair competition and the ability to compare results against an absolute standard over time, then the supersuits were wrong.

  • (11) If some technological advance undermines a valuable aspect of a sporting activity, then the use of that technology is wrong (within that sport).
  • (12) Inter-temporal comparisons of sporting (or, maybe, just swimming) performances are valuable.
  • (13) The use of performance-enhancing swimsuits, such as those used in the 2009 SWCs, undermines the inter-temporal comparison of swimming performances by making such comparisons unfair.
  • (1*) Therefore, the use of performance-enhancing swimsuits in the sport of swimming is wrong.

Read Philosophical Disquisitions

Image courtesy of Elke Sisco, cc by-nc-sa 2.0

Share.

Production engineer and certified swim coach. Full-time IT consultant, spare-time swimming aficionado. 2 sons, 2 daughters and a wife. President of the Faroe Islands Aquatics Federation. Likes to run :-)

Related Posts

1 Comment

  1. Threshold on

    All suits help (think before 2008, Thorpedo full bodysuit etc.), so going back to men only using jammers in 2010, must be wrong as well, if we value fair competition and the ability to compare results against an absolute standard over time … philosophically speaking. . . . bla bla bla. :-)

    Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version